Boardroom Governance Newsletter

Boardroom Governance Newsletter

Share this post

Boardroom Governance Newsletter
Boardroom Governance Newsletter
Proposed Settlement Does Not Solve U.S. Antitrust & Governance Concerns in $4.1B Lithium Saga

Proposed Settlement Does Not Solve U.S. Antitrust & Governance Concerns in $4.1B Lithium Saga

A few months ago I wrote an article about a proposed $4.1 billion transaction whereby Tianqi Lithium (“Tianqi”), a Chinese chemical…

Evan Epstein's avatar
Evan Epstein
Oct 11, 2018
∙ Paid

Share this post

Boardroom Governance Newsletter
Boardroom Governance Newsletter
Proposed Settlement Does Not Solve U.S. Antitrust & Governance Concerns in $4.1B Lithium Saga
Share

Satellite image taken in 2018 shows the solar evaporation ponds on the Atacama salt flat in the Atacama desert. Satellite images captured by LandSat-8 via United States Geological Survey

A few months ago I wrote an article about a proposed $4.1 billion transaction whereby Tianqi Lithium (“Tianqi”), a Chinese chemical company and one of the world’s biggest lithium producers, agreed to purchase 62,556,568 “Series A shares” of Sociedad Química y Minera de Chile S.A. (“SQM”), a U.S.-listed Chilean chemical company and another of the world’s leading lithium producers, from Nutrien, a U.S.-listed Canadian company and the world’s largest provider of crop inputs and services (the “Nutrien-Tianqi Transaction”).

What is at stake in this case is the availability and pricing of lithium chemical products, which has a direct impact in, and is particularly critical for, the U.S. technology industry and the U.S. electric vehicle market.

Lithium carbonate and lithium hydroxide are principally used to pro…

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to Boardroom Governance Newsletter to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Evan Epstein
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share